|
Thank you- this is very helpful. I just have a few follow up questions I'm curious about...
4. What is the main reason students read your newspaper?
I can't just say "because they're bored and we're fun." But, yeah, I dunno. I'm sure it's the location of the racks. -- And then I get into an internet pissing match over the E7 referendum. Highlights: "Can you comment on the student-university solidarity that this donation will bring and its relevance/irrelevance?" "I'm paying tuition and WEEF and I'm not feeling any solidarity.""I am liking the way Scott is setting the tone, and Nancy as an active member of the IW over the years, do you have any solid counter argument to oppose Scott on this matter? To point out the E7 referendum has been a sensitive case both in EngSoc and the student senate over the past two terms." "I'm NOT speaking as the editor and my views do NOT represent that of the IW, and really I don't see what my extracurricular activities has to do with anything. That being said, - A donation is NOT a guarantee that we'll get a study room, since it costs 2.4M to construct anyways. However the plans have been set and the study room WILL be built with student input regardless or not if the 2018s pony up the donations. - It's symbolic and I am not impressed. - Touche. - Why isn't it opt-in? I would like to reiterate that my opinions DO NOT reflect the position of the IW in any way."Yeah what would you know about this? You haven't been to an EngSoc meeting since ~2013. | |
|
- Tags:!rl, transcript
- Location:albert st
- Mood:derp
- Music:paramore - crushcrushcrush
"Article idea - the IOC rejected Saudi Arabia's bid to hold the Olympics cuz they wanted to have the men compete in Saudi Arabia and the women in Bahrain." "Wait seriously?" "They can't handle women in sportswear. Saudi Arabia only sent like two women athletes to the last Olympics. So they're letting Bahrain handle the women in sportswear." ( transcript ) | |
|
Monica was invited to Sylvia's potluck, and since everybody there is a vegetarian, vegan, or hippie, she elected to make a vegan paella. That's nice and tasty. We went shopping and bought a load of canned vegetables and tomato paste. I go to class and Monica does her potluck thing. M: Nancy can I use your salt N: Yeah go ahead
M: Can i use your pepper too lol N: Yeah go nuts
M: Can i borrow your can opener N: Yep
M: Your can opener is killing me Ikea Stam can openerThe trick with this one is to put it down horizontally on the can with the handle facing straight up, put your hands together, and pray. -- The initial term budget passed, as expected, and I conscripted a web and photo editor from the ranks of noobs. Shivani has also offered up her account for Dragon Age: Inquisition, but 1) it'd take me days to download and install it with the internet service in this place, 2) can my computer really run it? 3) do I have sixty+ hours to spare this term?  | |
|
Why did I only just find out about this song??? Dierks Bentley - Drunk on a PlaneThis has everything I like in a song right now. It's upbeat and and happy and smart and melancholic, and I'm enjoying it with my Arizona Lemonade. And it's a country song. Have I mentioned how much country love music I've been listening to lately? Damn, there's something about listening to a American person from a rural part of the country tell you parts of somebody's life story in plain English within a structure strictly bound by genre conventions and acoustic guitar. -- ( moar things ) | |
|
- Tags:!misc, joke, transcript
- Location:albert st
- Mood:almost doing homework
- Music:somethin bad - miranda lambert & carrie underwood
Her: My dad is registered to practice as a engineer in California, Hawaii, Ontario, Florida... Me: Whoa. Don't those licences expire? Her: Yeah, but he gets them renewed every time. He collects them! Me: Most people collect stuff like stamps. Her: So does he - engineering stamps!  | |
|
So. it was my birthday, and so I thought it was an excellent occasion to visit Mandy, one of my favourite people, since I hadn't seen her in a while, and it was cool, and she fed me tea and chicken nuggets. Later I realized it was a great time to have that talk with Julie too, since I definitely haven't seen her in a while either. Y'know, the talk where I ask "why fool with my boy" and she would likely go "why not". Or the one where I ask "Any remorse?" and she goes "loads of remorse." (hint: the last one didn't happen, but I hoped it, because then it makes something else would be right in the world. Hope the best of people, eh?)
Alas, it was not meant to be.
Perhaps it was my tone? It was definitely the shirty, "say-the-thing-that-I-know-you'd-say-but-I-want-to-hear-you-say-it-anyways" tone. Didn't even swear. It was obviously difficult for me to maintain a veneer of cordiality and I slipped into the condescending "awww" a few times. That, I should not have done.
Julie was as cool and controlled as the dames that you only read about in hardboiled mystery novels, other than the bit at the beginning where she avoided talking to me despite repeated invitations to "yo, sit down, let's talk, haven't seen you in a while" because a) I wasn't worth it, or b) she just did not want to talk to me. Nearly happened in November too, where she definitely would have prefered that I not visit Mandy at all at their house. I dunno, she knew this was coming. Still, one admires her composure, and I should be grateful that she deigned to speak with me at all.
This is someone who once wrote "Felt kinda bad (again) that [yours truly] didn't find anything, since it's like we went there only for my sake when it's Charles' birthday after all", and once walked me home when I was fall-over drunk, and told me everything was going to be OK. Shit, she even brought me little festively scented shower gels for Christmas once.
Main points -
"Did I do something to you?"
"No"
"Why"
"Didn't want to stop"
"I suppose one can't ask an apology from one who isn't remorseful"
"Nope" "Do you have something against me?"
"I definitely don't wish you ill."
Maybe the third one has a lawyerspeak in it: maybe, "oh sure I was remorseful but in response to your rhetorical question, nope!" but that takes a certain degree of ignorance that she doesn't have. Or, purposely lawyering it around, but what would that achieve? But it pretty unambiguously translated to "not sorry".
There are other things - yknow, that she might have stepped aside at the end of 2014 because she thought Charles and I could work it through - which ironically makes two whole people in the universe who thought Charles and I had more than a snowball's chance in hell - but that's not how things worked out.
And one understands how blind love is and how it changes one's sense of priorities. I've done immoral things in the pursuit of "love". So in a twisted sense, one empathizes.
Regardless of tone, dang, was it not wrong and maybe should not have been done? "Sorry for banging your boy when you weren't cool with it, it was uncool" too far for her to stoop for me? In Canada, one apologizes for getting one's foot stepped on.
Am I actually the villain of this story? The one intrudes where one isn't welcome and proceeds to look sad and irritably pry into the affairs of others? The one who airs one's dirty laundry on a public post?
It doesn't matter - and I'm sure Julie has her own perspective and rebuttal post on the topic - or perhaps for her it was merely Thursday, and I am but a fly to be swatted away - after that conversation I'd be surprised if I got a mention at all, since I obviously care a lot more about the lack of remorse than she does - and really, she's far more indifferent about me than I am about her - but this is what happened, and it was important for me to ask the questions, and important for me to hear the answers that I mostly already knew, more important than looking bad on the internet - and I'll swear by this account.
All in all, things went exactly as I expected. Unexpectedly, I feel a lot better. Not as good as I would if I had a real, honest-to-god apology - god, it all still hurts so bad, so much - which definitely is not coming now, or ever, and seriously, could I believe one now? (Nope.) But I know more now. Knowledge is good. | |
|
[1] Hey there [1] What's up..
[2] Hi. Why have you answered that the Earth is bigger than the sun?
[1] LOL [1] Bcz still I didn't go to sun [1] R u in Scarbrough I guess it's to be expected, but... :( | |
|
[1] hmm [1] in high school, were you one of those "I'm going to be foreveralone" types [1] because if so then this is actually quite amusing [2] yeah, i'm compensating. Thank you, I also appreciate the irony and will consider what you said about morality later. | |
|
- Tags:!misc, transcript
- Location:milliken
- Mood:slightly pissed off
- Music:metric - gimme sympathy
A short exchange of messages from a guy online just now. ( >.> ) | |
|
Can I not let these states of mind exist simultaneously?
f(t)=a(t)+b(t)+c(t)
a(t) approaches zero as t-> infinity. b(t) approaches zero as t-> infinity. c(t) approaches one as t-> infinity.
a(t) is bounded: [0, infinity) b(t) is bounded: (-infinity, 0] c(t) is not bounded.
[1] Just wait it out, man. Just wait it out. [2] Honestly, whose side are you on? What are you trying to have proven? [1] It doesn't accomplish anything (bad science) but that's what I want to watch play out. [1] Yes, it is. That's what I want to watch happen. More interesting that way. [1] It's good to have that back. | |
|
|